Traditional Teaching is still BEST!

In today's rapidly evolving educational landscape, the debate over traditional teaching versus modern methods continues to captivate educators, policymakers, and parents alike. While innovative approaches such as technology-enhanced learning and student-centered instruction have gained traction, the timeless wisdom of traditional teaching remains steadfast. This essay will explore why traditional teaching methods are still best, offering a foundation of stability, effectiveness, and human connection that transcends trends and technological advancements.

Traditional teaching, rooted in centuries-old pedagogical practices, emphasizes direct instruction, structured curriculum delivery, and teacher-led classrooms. This approach prioritizes foundational skills, academic rigor, and disciplined learning environments, providing students with a solid intellectual growth and development framework.

One of the key strengths of traditional teaching lies in its emphasis on foundational knowledge and skills. Students are systematically introduced to core concepts and competencies in various subject areas through structured lessons and sequential learning progressions. This scaffolding approach ensures that students master essential skills before advancing to more complex topics, laying a solid foundation for future academic success.

Moreover, traditional teaching fosters a sense of discipline, responsibility, and respect for authority. In teacher-led classrooms, students learn the importance of attentiveness, obedience, and adherence to rules and procedures. This structured environment instills valuable life skills such as time management, organization, and self-discipline, preparing students for the rigors of higher education and the workforce demands.

Furthermore, traditional teaching promotes a strong teacher-student relationship characterized by mentorship, guidance, and personalized support. In teacher-centered classrooms, educators serve as role models, mentors, and facilitators of learning, cultivating a sense of trust, rapport, and mutual respect with their students. This human connection is essential for fostering a positive learning environment, nurturing student motivation, and promoting academic engagement.

Another advantage of traditional teaching is its accessibility and inclusivity. Unlike technology-dependent approaches that may exacerbate the digital divide, traditional teaching methods require minimal resources and infrastructure, making them accessible to students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Additionally, traditional teaching accommodates different learning styles and preferences, allowing educators to employ various instructional strategies to meet the needs of all students.

Despite the myriad benefits of traditional teaching, critics argue that it needs more innovation, relevance, and adaptability in the digital age. They contend that traditional methods may stifle creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills, limiting students' ability to thrive in a rapidly changing world.

However, proponents of traditional teaching argue that innovation should complement rather than replace traditional methods. They assert that the timeless principles of effective teaching – clarity, coherence, and engagement – can be integrated with innovative approaches to create dynamic and effective learning experiences.

Moreover, traditional teaching provides a stable and reliable framework as a springboard for innovation and experimentation. Students develop the confidence and competence to explore new ideas, pursue creative endeavors, and adapt to new technologies and methodologies by mastering foundational skills and concepts.

Traditional teaching remains a cornerstone of effective education, offering a foundation of stability, effectiveness, and human connection that transcends trends and technological advancements. While innovative approaches have their place in modern education, traditional teaching methods play a vital role in fostering academic excellence, nurturing student growth, and preparing future generations for success. As we navigate the complexities of education in the 21st century, let us remember the enduring wisdom of traditional teaching and its timeless contributions to the pursuit of knowledge and enlightenment.

Traditional teaching methods have been a subject of extensive research and analysis, with proponents emphasizing their foundational knowledge and skills, discipline, and strong teacher-student relationships. (Prince, 2004; highlights the effectiveness of active learning, demonstrating that discussion, a form of active learning, surpasses traditional lectures for retention of material and developing thinking skills (Prince, 2004; . Alrahlah, 2016) provides a critical review of problem-based learning in dental education, shedding light on its effectiveness in providing students with required knowledge (Alrahlah, 2016; . Triepels et al., 2019) found that the use of a 3D tool resulted in higher factual anatomy knowledge and spatial anatomy knowledge compared to traditional methods, emphasizing the impact of three-dimensional anatomy on student understanding (Triepels et al., 2019; . Ismail et al., 2020) compared face-to-face teaching with internet-based teaching, highlighting the challenges of traditional training methods, particularly for those who do not speak English or live in countries with financial constraints (Ismail et al., 2020).

Furthermore, the potential impact of traditional teaching methods on various fields, such as medicine, nursing, and psychology, has been explored. Xu et al. (2022) emphasized the need to consider the implications of generative AI for journalism and media education, highlighting the importance of evaluating the intention for the adoption of AI-based robots in university education (Xu et al., 2022). Additionally, research by Goldberg & Crocombe (2017) discussed the role of massive open online courses in health care and medical education, highlighting the potential impact of innovative courses on replacing traditional teaching methods (Goldberg & Crocombe, 2017).

Traditional teaching methods have been extensively studied and compared with modern approaches, shedding light on their effectiveness and challenges in various educational and professional fields. The research provides valuable insights into the ongoing debate over traditional teaching versus modern methods, emphasizing the need to consider the implications and adaptability of traditional teaching in the digital age.

References:

Alenezi, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence versus arab universities: an enquiry into the saudi context. Humanities and Management Sciences - Scientific Journal of King Faisal University, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.37575/h/edu/220038

Alrahlah, A. (2016). How effective the problem-based learning (pbl) in dental education. a critical review. The Saudi Dental Journal, 28(4), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.08.003

Alrahlah, A. (2016). How effective the problem-based learning (pbl) in dental education. a critical review. The Saudi Dental Journal, 28(4), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.08.003

Barua, I., Vinsard, D., Jodal, H., Løberg, M., Kalager, M., Holme, Ø., … & Mori, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy, 53(03), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1201-7165

Botwe, B., Antwi, W., Arkoh, S., & Akudjedu, T. (2021). Radiographers’ perspectives on the emerging integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic imaging: the ghana study. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 68(3), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.460

Chaka, C. (2022). Fourth industrial revolution—a review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence, robotics and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 002. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18002

Chan, K. and Zary, N. (2019). Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. Jmir Medical Education, 5(1), e13930. https://doi.org/10.2196/13930

Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? the geography of intergenerational mobility in the united states *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553-1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju022

Corsello, A. and Santangelo, A. (2023). May artificial intelligence influence future pediatric research?—the case of chatgpt. Children, 10(4), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040757

Dwivedi, Y., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., … & Williams, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence (ai): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2019). Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e13216. https://doi.org/10.2196/13216

García-Mora, F. and Mora-Rivera, J. (2021). Exploring the impacts of internet access on poverty: a regional analysis of rural mexico. New Media & Society, 25(1), 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211000650

Goldberg, L. and Crocombe, L. (2017). Advances in medical education and practice: role of massive open online courses. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 8, 603-609. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s115321

Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C., & Botvinick, M. (2017). Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron, 95(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.011

He, J., Baxter, S., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019). The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0

Ismail, A., Rakovshik, S., & Abdelrahim, S. (2020). A randomised controlled study of face-to-face versus internet-based teaching of cbt skills for healthcare professionals in sudan. Bjpsych International, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2020.60

Ismail, A., Rakovshik, S., & Abdelrahim, S. (2020). A randomised controlled study of face-to-face versus internet-based teaching of cbt skills for healthcare professionals in sudan. Bjpsych International, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2020.60

Jobin, A. and Ienca, M. (2019). The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers' teaching and students' learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175

Neo, M., Lee, C., Tan, H., Neo, T., Tan, Y., Mahendru, N., … & Ismat, Z. (2022). Enhancing students’ online learning experiences with artificial intelligence (ai): the merlin project. International Journal of Technology, 13(5), 1023. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5843

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. (2022). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Roy, R., Babakerkhell, M., Mukherjee, S., Pal, D., & Funilkul, S. (2022). Evaluating the intention for the adoption of artificial intelligence-based robots in the university to educate the students. Ieee Access, 10, 125666-125678. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3225555

Ryan, J., O'Donovan, T., & McNulty, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: the opinions of radiographers and radiation therapists in ireland. Radiography, 27, S74-S82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.022

Sun, X. (2021). 5g joint artificial intelligence technology in the innovation and reform of university english education. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4892064

Trelease, R. (2016). From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e‐learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(6), 583-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1620

Triepels, C., Smeets, C., Notten, K., Kruitwagen, R., Fütterer, J., Vergeldt, T., … & Kuijk, S. (2019). Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?. Clinical Anatomy, 33(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23405

Triepels, C., Smeets, C., Notten, K., Kruitwagen, R., Fütterer, J., Vergeldt, T., … & Kuijk, S. (2019). Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?. Clinical Anatomy, 33(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23405

Tuomi, I. (2022). Artificial intelligence, 21st century competences, and socio‐emotional learning in education: more than high‐risk?. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12531

Xu, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., & Liu, F. (2022). Performance of problem-based learning based image teaching in clinical emergency teaching. Frontiers in Genetics, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.931640

Young, A., Amara, D., Bhattacharya, A., & Wei, M. (2021). Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(9), e599-e611. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00132-1

Zawacki‐Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0